Marquez Valdes-Scantling Week 10 fantasy outlook
‹ Pittsburgh SteelersNext game
Week 10 @ CIN · Sun, Nov 15 · 8:20 PM
Last game
Updated Tuesday, Nov 10, 6:27 AM ET
Week 10 outlook
@ CIN ·Practice squad
No projection this week
Practice squad, so no projection.
Fantasy points
4.23.22.2
WR168 · 3 games
Per game
1.41.10.7
WR153WR154WR155
Touchdowns
0
WR112 of 223
Targets
5
WR152 of 223
Receptions
2
WR160 of 223
Receiving yards
22
WR165 of 223
2026 regular season through Week 9. Ranks among WRs who have played; per-game ranks need 2+ games.
Season so far
Overall 2026 regular season
Game by game
Last seasons Game WR1/WR2/WR3 Season avg Next game
WR1/WR2/WR3 lines: the per-game level of the 12th, 24th and 36th WR this season (12-team league). Last seasons = that season's per-game average.
Season summary
Marquez Valdes-Scantling has 5 targets (WR152) and 22 receiving yards in 3 games, averaging 1 PPR points per game (WR153). No projection for Week 10 at the Cincinnati Bengals: Not on the active roster (reserve list, practice squad or similar), so no projection.
| 2026 so far | Valdes-Scantling | Avg starter WRAvg WR | DifferenceDiff |
|---|---|---|---|
| PPR points / game | 1.4 | 15.4 | −91% |
| Targets / game | 1.7 | 7.9 | −79% |
| Target share | 6% | 24% | −76% |
| Receiving yards / game | 7 | 71 | −90% |
| Yards / target | 4.4 | 9.3 | −53% |
| Catch rate | 40% | 66% | −39% |
| Touchdowns / game | 0.00 | 0.50 | −100% |
| Snap share | 39% | 76% | −49% |
Average starter = the top 36 WRs by PPR points per game (2+ games). Difference: green = 10%+ better, red = 10%+ worse. Updated with every data refresh.
Schedule strength
Next 3 games
Middle · 15th
32.1 PPR allowed to WRs / game · CIN, PHI, DEN
Rest of season
Easy · 1st
34.2 PPR allowed to WRs / game · 9 games
Fantasy playoffs
Easy · 5th
35.3 PPR allowed to WRs / game · Weeks 15–17
| Week | Opponent | PPR allowed to WRs / game | Defense rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| W10 | @ CIN | 30.8 | Middle · 18th |
| W11 | @ PHI | 37.9 | Easy · 4th |
| W12 | vs DEN | 27.6 | Tough · 27th |
| W13 | vs HOU | 38.5 | Easy · 2nd |
| W14 | @ JAX | 33.2 | Middle · 14th |
| W15 | vs BAL | 33.9 | Easy · 11th |
| W16 | vs CAR | 31.4 | Middle · 16th |
| W17 | @ TEN | 40.7 | Easy · 1st |
| W18 | @ BAL | 33.9 | Easy · 11th |
Rank of 32 by PPR points allowed to WRs this season.
Role profile
Rank among WRs with 2+ games this season (1st = best at the position; for interceptions and sacks, 1st = fewest); the bar shows where that sits in the field. Efficiency needs at least 10 targets or carries (quarterbacks: 30 pass attempts).
Role trend
Snap share Target share
Game log · 2026
Swipe sideways for more columns
Season by season
Swipe sideways for more columns
| Season | Team | G | Pts | Pts / g | Tgt | Rec | Yds | TD | Total yds | Total TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | GB | 16 | 111.092.073.0WR66 | 6.95.84.6WR84 | 73 | 38 | 581 | 2 | 610 | 2 |
| 2019 | GB | 16 | 84.171.158.1WR83 | 5.34.43.6WR98 | 56 | 26 | 452 | 2 | 461 | 2 |
| 2020 | GB | 16 | 137.3120.8104.3WR55 | 8.67.56.5WR72 | 63 | 33 | 690 | 6 | 703 | 6 |
| 2021 | GB | 11 | 87.074.061.0WR82 | 7.96.75.5WR76 | 55 | 26 | 430 | 3 | 430 | 3 |
| 2022 | KC | 17 | 122.4101.480.4WR54 | 7.26.04.7WR74 | 81 | 42 | 687 | 2 | 684 | 2 |
| 2023 | KC | 16 | 56.546.035.5WR106 | 3.52.92.2WR113 | 42 | 21 | 315 | 1 | 315 | 1 |
| 2024 | BUF/NO | 14 | 84.575.065.5WR89 | 6.05.44.7WR90 | 44 | 19 | 411 | 4 | 415 | 4 |
| 2025 | SF/PIT | 10 | 32.025.018.0WR131 | 3.22.51.8WR131 | 29 | 14 | 120 | 1 | 120 | 1 |
| 2026 | LAC | 3 | 4.23.22.2WR168 | 1.41.10.7WR153 | 5 | 2 | 22 | 0 | 22 | 0 |
Regular season. The tag under each number is his rank at the position that season (PPR; per game: 4+ games). Green = top 12, blue = 13–24.
How these numbers are made
- Player ID
- 00-0034272
- Projection made
- Data snapshot
- Season stats
- nflverse play-by-play and player stats (CC-BY 4.0)
- Fantasy scoring
- Standard rules: PPR, half PPR (0.5 per catch), standard. Scored points use the official stats, including 2-point conversions and return touchdowns. Projections leave those two out: they are rare and not modeled.
More WR rankings · Usage report