Next Down IQ
★

CeeDee Lamb Week 10 fantasy outlook

‹ Dallas Cowboys

Week 10 fantasy outlook

WRDallas Cowboys#88

No injury report yet

Next game

Week 10 vs SF · Sun, Nov 15 · 4:25 PM

18.214.911.7pts · range 13.0–24.8 ptspts · range 10.7–20.4 ptspts · range 8.3–15.9 pts
MUST START

WR5WR5WR5 this weekWR3 on the season

Last game

Week 9 @ IND, W 27–23

33.5 pts28.5 pts23.5 pts · 10 catches on 16 targets, 195 yds, 1 TD

CompareGames

Updated Tuesday, Nov 10, 6:27 AM ET

Week 10 outlook

vs SF ·

No injury report yet

Must start

CeeDee Lamb is a locked-in start this week. Our numbers for the game are 9 targets, 7 receptions, 87 receiving yards and 1 touchdown. He has been up and down, at 24, 13 and 34 points. San Francisco is a hard spot for receivers: the 5th-fewest points allowed. Yes, start him this week.

Week 10 in numbers

Fantasy points

Projected

18.214.911.7

pts · WR5WR5WR5 this week

range 13.010.78.3–24.820.415.9 pts

Season average

22.418.514.6

pts per game · 9 games

Projected stats

Receptions

6.5

Receiving yards

87.3

Receiving TDs

0.5

Matchup · defense

27.1pts allowed to WRsTough · 5th fewest

Trends to know

  • Snap share climbing: 94% last game, 78% before.

Ranks compare players at the position this week. Projections assume the player is active.

Fantasy points

201.8166.8131.8

WR2 · 9 games

Per game

22.418.514.6

WR3WR3WR3

Touchdowns

7

WR2 of 223

Targets

108

WR1 of 223

Receptions

70

WR2 of 223

Receiving yards

904

WR2 of 223

2026 regular season through Week 9. Ranks among WRs who have played; per-game ranks need 2+ games.

Week 10 fantasy points range

Big game: 25 or more pts30% a real chance, about 1 in 3
Dud: 9 or fewer pts15% an outside chance

There is a 50% chance he scores between 13 and 25 points.

Season so far

Overall 2026 regular season

Game by game

17.6'24 avg14.3'25 avg15.4W135.3W220.2W341.3W42.9W516W624.4W712.8W833.5W918.2W10WR1WR2WR3
14.2'24 avg11.7'25 avg12.9W131.3W216.7W332.8W41.9W511.5W621.9W79.3W828.5W914.9W10WR1WR2WR3
10.8'24 avg9'25 avg10.4W127.3W213.2W324.3W40.9W57W619.4W75.8W823.5W911.7W10WR1WR2WR3
10.1'24 avg8.4'25 avg8W19W28W321W45W518W612W711W816W99.1W10WR1WR2WR3
27%W129%W220%W349%W412%W533%W646%W739%W847%W9WR1WR2WR3
6.7'24 avg5.4'25 avg5W18W27W317W42W59W65W77W810W96.5W10WR1WR2WR3
79.6'24 avg76.9'25 avg44W1153W2112W3189W49W570W674W758W8195W987.3W10WR1WR2WR3
0.4'24 avg0.2'25 avg1W12W20W31W40W50W62W70W81W9WR1WR2WR3
81%W175%W282%W386%W457%W588%W681%W776%W894%W9WR1WR2WR3

Last seasons Game WR1/WR2/WR3 Season avg Next game

WR1/WR2/WR3 lines: the per-game level of the 12th, 24th and 36th WR this season (12-team league). Last seasons = that season's per-game average.

Season summary

CeeDee Lamb has 108 targets (WR1) and 904 receiving yards in 9 games, averaging 22 PPR points per game (WR3). For Week 10 vs the San Francisco 49ers, Lamb projects for 18 PPR points (WR5), and about half the time between 13.0 and 24.8.

2026 so farLambAvg starter WRAvg WRDifferenceDiff
PPR points / game22.415.4+46%
Targets / game12.07.9+53%
Target share33%24%+36%
Receiving yards / game10071+42%
Yards / target8.49.3−10%
Catch rate65%66%−2%
Touchdowns / game0.780.50+54%
Snap share80%76%+5%

Average starter = the top 36 WRs by PPR points per game (2+ games). Difference: green = 10%+ better, red = 10%+ worse. Updated with every data refresh.

Schedule strength

Next 3 games

Easy · 4th

35.2 PPR allowed to WRs / game · SF, TEN, PHI

Rest of season

Middle · 17th

31.7 PPR allowed to WRs / game · 8 games

Fantasy playoffs

Tough · 24th

30.2 PPR allowed to WRs / game · Weeks 15–17

WeekOpponentPPR allowed to WRs / gameDefense rank
W10vs SF27.1Tough · 28th
W11vs TEN40.7Easy · 1st
W12vs PHI37.9Easy · 4th
W13@ SEA22.7Tough · 32nd
W15@ LA27.6Tough · 26th
W16vs JAX33.2Middle · 14th
W17vs NYG29.9Middle · 20th
W18@ WAS34.7Easy · 9th

Rank of 32 by PPR points allowed to WRs this season.

Role profile

Targets / game12.0 · 2nd of 201
Target share33% · 3rd of 201
Snap share80% · 27th of 200
Red-zone targets18.0 · 2nd of 201
Yards / target8.4 · 56th of 132
PPR points / game22.4 · 3rd of 201

Rank among WRs with 2+ games this season (1st = best at the position; for interceptions and sacks, 1st = fewest); the bar shows where that sits in the field. Efficiency needs at least 10 targets or carries (quarterbacks: 30 pass attempts).

Role trend

0%50%100%94%47%W1W2W3W4W5W6W7W8W9

Snap share Target share

Game log · 2026

Swipe sideways for more columns

WkOppResultPtsProjTgtRecYdsTDTgt %Snap%Total ydsTotal TD
W1@ NYGL 20–2815.412.910.4———8544127%81%441
W2vs WASW 37–2035.331.327.3———98153229%75%1532
W3vs BALL 31–3420.216.713.2———87112020%82%1120
W4@ HOUW 34–3041.332.824.314.611.99.22117189149%86%1831
W5vs TBL 16–242.91.90.917.414.110.8529012%57%90
W6@ GBL 13–2316.011.57.016.113.110.018970033%88%700
W7@ PHIW 38–2124.421.919.416.312.59.612574246%81%742
W8vs ARIL 30–3312.89.35.818.612.39.611758039%76%580
W9@ INDW 27–2333.528.523.515.912.09.31610195147%94%1951

Season by season

Swipe sideways for more columns

SeasonTeamGPtsPts / gTgtRecYdsTDTotal ydsTotal TD
2020DAL16217.7180.7143.7WR2213.611.39.0WR3311174935510176
2021DAL16232.8193.3153.8WR1914.612.19.6WR21120791102611786
2022DAL17301.6248.1194.6WR517.714.611.4WR71561071359914069
2023DAL17403.2335.7268.2WR123.719.715.8WR1181135174912186214
2024DAL15263.4212.9162.4WR817.614.210.8WR81521011194612646
2025DAL14200.9163.4125.9WR2214.311.79.0WR12117751077310793
2026DAL9201.8166.8131.8WR222.418.514.6WR31087090478987

Regular season. The tag under each number is his rank at the position that season (PPR; per game: 4+ games). Green = top 12, blue = 13–24.

Related players

Teammates who share the ball

Most targets and carries on the team this season.

Similar WR projection this week

The WRs ranked just above and below in projected points.

How these numbers are made
Player ID
00-0036358
Projection made
Data snapshot
Season stats
nflverse play-by-play and player stats (CC-BY 4.0)
Fantasy scoring
Standard rules: PPR, half PPR (0.5 per catch), standard. Scored points use the official stats, including 2-point conversions and return touchdowns. Projections leave those two out: they are rare and not modeled.

Methodology

More WR rankings · Usage report